??? 07/07/06 10:12 Read: times |
#119796 - I wouldn't bet on it Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Abhishek Bk said:
... in Linux ... I guess it is going to be easier than it in NT systems. NT systems dont allow easy access to hardware. If you mean that NT-based systems make you go through their proper driver/API stuff, rather than directly accessing the hardware, then I wouldn't bet on that! No multitasking operating system can allow tasks to go directly accessing harware willy-nilly - not if it wants to give any sort of stability. Therefore, I guess that Linux will also require you to go through its proper driver/API stuff to access the ports...? Whether the "proper driver/API stuff" is any "easier" in Linux than NT is, of course, another matter... |
Topic | Author | Date |
Reading Bounce Characteristics on a PC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
System Requirements | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Nothing in perticular | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OS? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Microsoft XP; 2000; NT; 98 ;95 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
all? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I wouldn't bet on it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
totally irrelevant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What loads are switched? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It would be interesting to know things | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Implimentation details | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Again... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Well the relays are ..... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Only to detect mains voltage? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, I know but..... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no, they are not "independent of the supply voltag | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Comparable to relays | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Optos | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Exiting stuff! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not necessarily! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It would be interesting to know things | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Could somebody verifiy the result | 01/01/70 00:00 |