| ??? 04/20/06 17:29 Read: times |
#114625 - a loadcell under a leg of the bed ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
would definitely be a possiblity. Since the deviation between empty and occupied bed is quite dramatic you would not need any of the fancy A/D precision and zero compensation reading it.
They are typically not the best source re price, but for a view od loadcells have a lok at http://www.omega.com. While I have no idea what just a loadcell would cost, here is an idea about pricing: The scales I designed the code for came to $98 retail for the economy model of the series. That was electronics, housing, labor markup atc in addition to the loadcell. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| looking for sensor solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's a scandal... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: it's a scandal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a loadcell under a leg of the bed ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re : loadcell | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Movement profile | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'm getting an Idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| cheap "load cells" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| QPROX? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What about.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I like the motion detector under the bed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So that'd be.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| two problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| these might be an issue, but ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Or... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| maybe not totally carzy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ah butt... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yeah | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Funny! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hi Kai---- | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No, no... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I would liked to see your pic | 01/01/70 00:00 |