| ??? 03/26/06 17:42 Read: times |
#113140 - well, to some extent you need to Responding to: ???'s previous message |
The only reason I could think of for emulating what happens between CPU cycles (i.e. the 12 clock sequences) was that someone could use the emulator core to whip up a plug-in for electronics workbench or some such.
The citeria for an emulator is that it exactly mimic the device it emulates. So to emulate you must "emulate some of what happens between CPU cycles". For instance if someone employ memory mapoped I/O that access must be timed the same as with the actual chip or the emulation is worthless. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| new free 8052 emulator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you're willing ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| emulation details | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Jump from emulator to model | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| We had 'em with HILO in '86 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sub-clock emulation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well, to some extent you need to | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| worthlessness | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ok, I'll rephrase | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ack | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Windoze only? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| cross-platform | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You mean Simulator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'd guess he wanted to avoid that term | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| simulator vs emulator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well, then it is a simulator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Reinventing the wheel is fun | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sounds good to me | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Too many black box simulators | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I've got to agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
0.6 and stuff | 01/01/70 00:00 |