| ??? 03/09/06 16:24 Read: times |
#111747 - i do, follow much of it Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I have stated 1000s of times "testing is worthless, design it to work". To a large degree that is the basis of Correct by construction.
I have seen ever so many "tested" things with problems (typically of the "it happens now and then" kind) Whereas a properly designed (constructed) product either works or do not. If you design and verify before you code, the errors you will find will be of the type my mentor Howard Taylor called "clerical errors". Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| i suggest you read | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Flawed article | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| men only | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you don;'t know Jack | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you want a laugh? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Tar with the same brush | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i dont think so | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| grades??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Snobbery | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re grades | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Graduates | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Value of Education | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It is sad, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cost of Education | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| gonna get a PhD, or a lobotomy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| lobotomy? do you like the idea? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| just to clerify | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I'm glad you said that ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Likewise ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Correct by construction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| i do, follow much of it | 01/01/70 00:00 |