| ??? 06/07/13 02:05 Read: times |
#189884 - Bugs... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Mikkel C. Simonsen said:
When you reverse the lockbits/fusebits steps, the software runs at (almost) the correct speed. The "almost" part is my own fault - the software was originally written for the AT89C2051, and it needs a bit more tweaking. If you are not 'locked into' a package, note that the newer LP52 is cheaper than the LP214. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Programming AT89LP214 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| easily | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not so easy with an Arghmel | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How certain are you of the applicability of your cable? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Correct, ancient, cable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No Crystal needed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| More testing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SS is needed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The secret SS pin | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Secret SS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Parallel ports are easy to find... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bugs... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bugs... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Size matters | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| with all this stupid stuff I would immediately ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Alternatives | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What do you expect ... it's ATMEL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| this is ATMEL ... what do you expect? | 01/01/70 00:00 |