Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/06/13 04:25
Read: times


 
#189874 - SS is needed
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Mikkel C. Simonsen said:

It looks like the SS is part of the programming interface. So why doesn't the 89ISP manual mention it at all? But I pulled it high with a 10k resistor.


If you look at
Figure 23-4. ISP Command Packet

then I'd say SS is needed as a framing signal. ie It will not work left high.

Check the programmer for a pin that behaves like SS, even if it is not documented.

List of 18 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Programming AT89LP214            01/01/70 00:00      
   easily            01/01/70 00:00      
      Not so easy with an Arghmel            01/01/70 00:00      
   How certain are you of the applicability of your cable?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Correct, ancient, cable            01/01/70 00:00      
         No Crystal needed            01/01/70 00:00      
            More testing            01/01/70 00:00      
               SS is needed            01/01/70 00:00      
                  The secret SS pin            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Secret SS            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Parallel ports are easy to find...            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Bugs...            01/01/70 00:00      
                               Bugs...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 Size matters            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    with all this stupid stuff I would immediately ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Alternatives            01/01/70 00:00      
                              What do you expect ... it's ATMEL            01/01/70 00:00      
                     this is ATMEL ... what do you expect?            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List