| ??? 02/28/13 12:09 Read: times |
#189508 - Precision distance! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
11ppm on a clock takes a bit of work as described, but is do-able at moderate cost. 0.02 sec at 80 m/sec is 1.6 metres, which I suspect will be tougher to do than the time measurement. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Looking for direction - racing application | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| step by step | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| First step... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well, you are new | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| First, check number sizes and precisions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Good catch on the clock accuracy. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Judging | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Judging | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Rethink your solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not sure we're seeing eye to eye... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| think precision | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Increasing accuarcy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Precision still matters. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Precision distance! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Rulebook on timing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| They have a serious system | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| very imprecise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re: speed | 01/01/70 00:00 |