| ??? 02/27/13 18:04 Read: times |
#189494 - Rethink your solution Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I know I need to get 90 x 16124 pulses in 1800 seconds in order to cross the finish line on my perfect moving average.
My understanding of the problem is that this might help you but is not needed for you to win - your course position vs. time is what will guarantee a win. If you stick to your plan, you will only have a distance traveled - and does not consider your position on the road. You need the exact remaining distance and time. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Looking for direction - racing application | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| step by step | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| First step... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well, you are new | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| First, check number sizes and precisions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Good catch on the clock accuracy. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Judging | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Judging | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Rethink your solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not sure we're seeing eye to eye... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| think precision | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Increasing accuarcy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Precision still matters. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Precision distance! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Rulebook on timing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| They have a serious system | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| very imprecise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re: speed | 01/01/70 00:00 |