| ??? 10/10/10 13:21 Read: times |
#179022 - unfair comparison Responding to: ???'s previous message |
But the good thing with SPI is that it is simple. Both if the processor has a dedicated SPI interface and if you have to do it in software. So the developer can focus on what to send, instead of trying to figure out how to send. Way more people tends to stumble with I2C-connected devices.
no IIC stumble if the processor has a dedicated IIC interface Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| 5V configurable bus expansions? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| have a look | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Like this ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| CPLD/FPGA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maxim chip looking real nice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 7301 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| But SPI as carrier is at least very easy to use | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| unfair comparison | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not really true | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I2C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Don't entirely agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| picky | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not even that! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Subject is changed. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
External pull-up or '245 are much too limiting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Totally Agree | 01/01/70 00:00 |