Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
08/13/10 12:42
Read: times


 
#177984 - the "interrupt priority list"
A post in another thered made me wonder. Has anyone ever had a reason to take the "interrupt priority list" into consideration ?
I never have and would like to know if anyone has and why

from 'the bible"
Note that the “priority within level” structure is only used to resolve
simultaneous requests of the same priority level.


This seems to be a common source of misunderstandings

Erik


List of 9 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
the "interrupt priority list"            01/01/70 00:00      
   latency calculation            01/01/70 00:00      
      but            01/01/70 00:00      
         Do I understand this correctly...            01/01/70 00:00      
            priority (IP) and 'polling sequence" (the chip)            01/01/70 00:00      
               how to interpret "interrupts occuring at the same time            01/01/70 00:00      
         sequence can't be influenced            01/01/70 00:00      
            no, it is 'random' because ..            01/01/70 00:00      
               latency calculation            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List