| ??? 03/29/10 19:23 Read: times |
#174603 - many ways to skin a cat Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Only if two interrupts becomes possible at the same clock cycle?
I would, to go by your verbiage change it to Only if two interrupts becomes activate at the same clock cycle? Anyhow, I would say that the important stuff here is that this 'priority' is best forgotten. A CONTEST: can anyone come up with a case where this 'concurrent interrupt priority' has any importance. For it to be important, two ingerrupts must always be concurrent?? Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Timer Problem Assembly Code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Interrupt priorities... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Also... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The missing words | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You sure? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| many ways to skin a cat | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Actually very relevant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| My impression is | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Interesting, but missing the point surely... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Interrupts are 'saved' | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Soft interrupts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| in a '51 forum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Still missing the point... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the missing reti's have already been mentioned | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Apart from missing reti... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Interupt priorities | 01/01/70 00:00 |