| ??? 03/08/10 10:47 Read: times |
#173937 - oscilloscope is fine, but in this case... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Andy Neil said:
Joel Ward said:
I will also change the length od the delays, but increasing them seems to make no difference Have you checked Jan's previous comment about delay loops in 'C' ? Rather than just randomly change delays, have you looked at what's actually happening, using an oscilloscoscope? ... it should be enough to have a look at the generated assembler for the delay. JW |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Display problems | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| forgot to mention! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| read the datasheet and buy the iron | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| just a minute ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If you can't "afford" the one pin for the R/W signal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why not address his question instead of wasting more money? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| odd behaviour | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Magic? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| oscilloscope is fine, but in this case... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Both, I think | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "magic" is synonym for "luck" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| working | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| min & max limits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Delay lengths | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
If only folks would do what we once always did ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RW pin is defined but | 01/01/70 00:00 |