??? 10/27/09 18:47 Read: times |
#170113 - We'll see... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Per said:
That is of course the reason why normally only one of the suggested methods are used in real life. If you google a bit, you can see two methods that are often used. Nevertheless, there's, as always is, a big difference between a scheme that works somehow and a scheme that is foolproof against misconnections, shorts, etc., etc. So, what might look simple at first sight can become unsolvable, if your product must be fully surge-, burst- and ESD-resistant... Kai Klaas |
Topic | Author | Date |
How to measure cable length (RJ45) using 8051? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Some motivating questions... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hints | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Look up TDR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
maybe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Right now... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Some Ideas | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not practical with a '51, but with a scope | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Great progress | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
We'll see... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
End goal is important when selecting method | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
use pulse method | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
yeah TDR?![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |