| ??? 05/27/09 20:40 Read: times |
#165635 - I assume so... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I assume exactly this because for the testcase (plain 8052) no variables have been added or deleted nor have memory spaces been altered. It is the same source that was compilable with an older compiler version days before.
(I discovered this only because I thought that upgarding my SDCC might be a good idea, seems I was wrong) I crossposted at the SDCC forums and waiting for input from them too. cheers, Matthias |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| SDCC Linker problem with CMON51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a wild, wild guess | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I already tried a typecast | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why not take this to the SDCC forum? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Already considered this... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| another possibility which is easy to check if ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I assume so... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| findings | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| findings2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Temporary fix | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| back to the drawing board... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it's much less for DATA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| fix for --funsigned-char | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'd like to but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how to patch | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Patch worked but SDCC doesn't compile anymore... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| HOW doesn't compile? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Buffer cut | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not enough direct-addressable memory | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nice idea but.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I can try with the versions I have here... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sure, why not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Solution found | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SDCC Linker problem with CMON51 | 01/01/70 00:00 |