| ??? 05/27/09 19:26 Read: times |
#165632 - I can try with the versions I have here... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
... on Win (oh, who said Lin is much better for compilers and stuff? ;-) ) - are the sources under the link above the same you used, so that we can compare the results?
Meantime, you might post your .sym files (their "bottoms") here, so that we can chew on it... JW |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| SDCC Linker problem with CMON51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a wild, wild guess | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I already tried a typecast | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why not take this to the SDCC forum? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Already considered this... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| another possibility which is easy to check if ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I assume so... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| findings | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| findings2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Temporary fix | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| back to the drawing board... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it's much less for DATA | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| fix for --funsigned-char | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'd like to but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| how to patch | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Patch worked but SDCC doesn't compile anymore... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| HOW doesn't compile? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Buffer cut | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not enough direct-addressable memory | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nice idea but.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I can try with the versions I have here... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sure, why not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Solution found | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SDCC Linker problem with CMON51 | 01/01/70 00:00 |