| Erik Malund 04/14/17 07:39 Read: 925 times Mt Airy, Nc USA |
#190778 - the '51 faster than cortex @ floating point Responding to: Andy Neil's previous message |
the '51 faster than cortex @ floating point
what a surprise the '51 uses far less memory than cortex @ floating point not a surprise, this is the thing always forgotten when comparing ARM and '51 http://community.silabs.com/t5/32-bit...63#U194663 yes, the '51 is clocked faster than the ARM in the above, but the rumor about how miserable the '51 is in comparison is blatantly false. again it is an application issue I have used the ARM in 4 of my last 5 projects |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Irony - NXP now back into 8-bit! | Andy Neil | 04/03/17 02:08 |
| Motorola ain't Philips... | Jan Waclawek | 04/03/17 05:37 |
| Oh, the Irony | Andy Neil | 04/03/17 10:45 |
| male cow manure | Erik Malund | 04/03/17 10:52 |
| the '51 faster than cortex @ floating point | Erik Malund | 04/14/17 07:39 |
| Let's be specific about "Cortex" (sic) | Andy Neil | 04/14/17 14:51 |
| Fish | Michael Karas | 04/14/17 23:21 |
| just to show the fact that .... | Erik Malund | 04/15/17 08:57 |
| or the fact that ... | Andy Neil | 04/17/17 16:41 |
agreed | Erik Malund | 04/17/17 16:48 |