| ??? 04/08/12 09:38 Read: times |
#187057 - Normally Responding to: ???'s previous message |
If you take a photo of a mirror for example, you have to be in front of the mirror, if you use a shift and tilt lens you don't have to be in front of the mirror to get a photo of the mirror.Its also as you say used to straighten converging verticals in architectural photos.
If you stand if front of a tall building and point the camera up to get the whole building into the frame the result is the building will look as if its falling backwards because the vertical walls look like they are converging at the top. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| "seeing" around corners | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nobody finds this interesting? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Its holiday time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Reflection? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Normally | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| paralax | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No its not parralax | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| But loss of reflection is just secondary result of off-axis | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's why they have the features on those view cameras | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 2D? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| time of flight | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bostonian | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I don't see that as an overstatement | 01/01/70 00:00 |