??? 11/16/11 05:35 Read: times |
#184758 - interpreter/compiler Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hi Richard,
One of a number of BASIC interpreters with which I once had contact did the "build" operation during the first run, then saved the tokenized BASIC rather than the plain-text that had been entered. Strictly speaking, that would be a single pass compiler, not an interpreter. Practically speaking, I'd not bet they were of any greater value. Joe P.S. Happy Veteran's Day, and thank you! |
Topic | Author | Date |
Interpreted Languages? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sometimes it's hidden | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
p-code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
P-code and others | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
interpreter/compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Debatable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not necessarily machine code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Definitely debatable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ofcourse not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
runtime errors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You can't | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You missed the point! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not always worth it with interpreted languaes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I like your thinking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Many FORTH implementations are interpreted, aren't they? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Forth | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Maybe a comparison? | 01/01/70 00:00 |