| ??? 11/15/11 17:14 Read: times |
#184746 - Maybe a comparison? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I found this neat pdf article describing some of the differences that may be worth looking into.
http://renar.co/media/doc...nagues.pdf The article does make some good points albeit with not so well organized grammar. So, do not just penalize because the read is sometimes hard to follow. However, I always fancied the idea that with interpreted languages that the source code could actually change on the fly without the need of a compiler based around the OS. Perhaps several networked machines that may be running different OS and different parts of structured code, maybe one portion of the moderator code would actually dynamically change another portion of code on another machine. Kind of supporting an adaptive learning method for computers. The idea is far out in left field and I doubt I might ever see anything like this. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Interpreted Languages? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sometimes it's hidden | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| p-code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| P-code and others | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| interpreter/compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Debatable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not necessarily machine code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Definitely debatable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ofcourse not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| runtime errors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You can't | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You missed the point! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not always worth it with interpreted languaes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I like your thinking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Many FORTH implementations are interpreted, aren't they? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Forth | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maybe a comparison? | 01/01/70 00:00 |