Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
11/11/11 23:08
Read: times


 
#184656 - Interpreted Languages?
One of the oft-claimed advantages of Interpreted Languages is that you don't have the overhead of the "build" cycle.

As I'm currently working with an Interpreted Language (Python - not on an 8051), I'm coming to think that this is not (necessarily) all it's cracked-up to be:

  • A "conventional" build (compiler, linker, etc) has to check all the code for syntax & semantics before it will give you anything to run;

  • An interpreter, on the other hand, may not actually notice such errors until it actually tries to "run" the offending line - which could be some considerable time into the program

  • List of 17 messages in thread
    TopicAuthorDate
    Interpreted Languages?            01/01/70 00:00      
       Sometimes it's hidden            01/01/70 00:00      
          p-code            01/01/70 00:00      
          P-code and others            01/01/70 00:00      
          interpreter/compiler            01/01/70 00:00      
             Debatable            01/01/70 00:00      
                Not necessarily machine code            01/01/70 00:00      
                   Definitely debatable            01/01/70 00:00      
                      Ofcourse not            01/01/70 00:00      
       runtime errors            01/01/70 00:00      
          You can't            01/01/70 00:00      
          You missed the point!            01/01/70 00:00      
             Not always worth it with interpreted languaes            01/01/70 00:00      
                I like your thinking            01/01/70 00:00      
                   Many FORTH implementations are interpreted, aren't they?            01/01/70 00:00      
                      Forth            01/01/70 00:00      
       Maybe a comparison?            01/01/70 00:00      

    Back to Subject List