??? 11/11/11 23:08 Read: times |
#184656 - Interpreted Languages? |
One of the oft-claimed advantages of Interpreted Languages is that you don't have the overhead of the "build" cycle.
As I'm currently working with an Interpreted Language (Python - not on an 8051), I'm coming to think that this is not (necessarily) all it's cracked-up to be: |
Topic | Author | Date |
Interpreted Languages? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sometimes it's hidden | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
p-code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
P-code and others | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
interpreter/compiler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Debatable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not necessarily machine code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Definitely debatable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ofcourse not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
runtime errors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You can't | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You missed the point! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not always worth it with interpreted languaes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I like your thinking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Many FORTH implementations are interpreted, aren't they? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Forth | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Maybe a comparison? | 01/01/70 00:00 |