| ??? 05/01/11 06:10 Read: times |
#182136 - The key point is Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Michael Karas said:
So the search for randomness needs to be tempered with "what is good enough" Indeed. But the most common issue with posts on forums like this is the failure to realise that rand() and suchlike are only pseudo-random - which is not actually "random" at all... |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Truly Random Number Generator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Latency Time Problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| this is bad | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Don't think 1:1 mapping | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| understanding | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Doesn't matter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yeah, yeah!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Way more than 3 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| baloney | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So easy to make assumptions and crash and burn | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Missing the point! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Its just soooo wrong | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Randomness - NOT | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The key point is | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Johnson noise versus zener noise... | 01/01/70 00:00 |