| ??? 02/17/11 08:36 Read: times |
#181143 - Handshake works quite well Responding to: ???'s previous message |
ARM close-to-release announcement from 1996:
http://www.eetimes.com/electroni...essor-core But initial reporting was around 1993, 1994. The great thing is that every single transistor stage have auto-power-save, i.e. without a clock, no transistor changes state unless there is a state change on the input. And the VCC will not see the huge current spikes from a clocked device. For some reason, I only see references to the project name Amulet. But I was pretty sure that they had a fancy name for it too - similar to StrongARM. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Why CLOCK Required? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a nontechnical explanation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Student? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No need for a clock... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why not have a clock? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The Clockless Controller | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Handshake Solutions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Handshake works quite well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Asynchronous logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| actual answer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Absolutely Right....Andy Peters | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the triggers need clock to work | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Note that edges only needed if you have changing input data | 01/01/70 00:00 |