| ??? 01/24/11 15:55 Read: times |
#180757 - There are standards and standards Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Jan Waclawek said:
[...] unfortunately, both have not quite standard syntax. Define "standard syntax". Some assemblers defines standard as the being similar to (and using same mnemonics) as the original chip manufacturer used in the original chip documentation. Some other assemblers defines standard as in using a unified syntax for all supported architectures. gas is an assembler that has standardized on uniformity, so an Motorola programmer will recognize the mnemonics when programming an Intel chip (while an Intel programmer will probably hate gas something fiercely). |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| language options | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Check Here | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There's a PASCAL link under LINKS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you are all making it difficult to read | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Edit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the edit is time limited and has expired | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Epascal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| New list in alphabetic order | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| More Inputs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| which compiler is free | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| free as in free beer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| free... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ASEM-51 isn't a compiler ... but it is FREE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| GNU assembler (gas - from binutils) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There are standards and standards | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Web51 & gas | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
a couple more ... | 01/01/70 00:00 |