??? 11/27/10 16:19 Modified: 11/27/10 16:20 Read: times |
#179687 - No question about that Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I'm aware of the facts regarding NI. I have purchased and worked with several of their products, both hardware and software.
It's their app-notes that seem to be a constant source of trouble. Like many otherwise reasonable advertisers, and it is the fact they're wearing their advertiser/marketing hat when they do this that is the apparent source of the problem, they're so focused on making things appear to be dirt-simple, that they publish app-notes that simply don't work as published. There's generally an underlying principle that is valid, but I certainly don't understand why NI, among others, publish app-notes that haven't been verified. Nevertheless, if you rely on one of their app-notes, you get what you deserve. RE |
Topic | Author | Date |
Switch off a LED array | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What are the switches? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Virtual ground at 3.3V | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
3.3V Regulator Idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The 3.3V regulator idea might not work! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It is a SOURCE board ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Hhm, leakage currents? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Solution in sight | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
LED tester shows bad design/bad parts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Who is the designer ?? Stand up.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
LED tester shows bad design/bad parts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I wouldn't rely on anything published by NI | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
crying wolf again?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
NI is not a fly-by-night-operator | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No question about that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The "crying wolf" is right here... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I also say it... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Leakage current analysis | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Also, the voltage across the load.... | 01/01/70 00:00 |