| ??? 07/30/10 18:06 Read: times |
#177533 - No-on last question. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Joseph Hebert said:
But if I design a selection of hardware filters and incorporated them into a board with an 8052, could I call the resultant SBC a DSP? If not, why? Your hardware filters will be probably analog circuits, so how to call this board "Digital" Signal Processing board. For me DSP means ADC(or some stream from some ADC ) with micro, which can extract usefull info from that stream. I mean also that analog type signal is something different, but not n UART stream. You can make DSP with 8052, but its hard , needs many bits fast math. So i cant call 8052 to be DSP type. What is difference between microprocessor and microcontroller? For me - at least built-in oscillator and one UART. regards |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| µ-controllers, µ-processors and DSPs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No-on last question. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| early DSP's had no converters | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Signal Processing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Digitial signal processing is mainly math. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it's all marketing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There really isn't a true distinction anymore. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 8051 + MAC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I know. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There is some confusion.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DSP designed for concurrency of simple operations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Still some confusion... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| processor/processing, and absolute time contra clock cycles | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You're being too practical | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| No magic ISR advantage for uC in relation to uP | 01/01/70 00:00 |