| ??? 03/08/10 06:34 Modified: 03/08/10 06:45 Read: times |
#173931 - Which court? (edited) Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
... the non-compete was proven worthless in court. By that, you presumably mean a US court? Beware that this is an international forum, and other jurisdictions may vary... it has been established in several court cases that what you have in your head is yours to do as you see fit At least over here, I think a "trade secret" is still a trade secret irrespective of whether it's just "in your head"? |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Patents do have their uses. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Noncompete clauses in employment contracts have purpose, too | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| and are totally worthless | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Which court? (edited) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| UK employment law | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There's a problem with that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I don't think that's strictly true | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ive been speaking to a solicitor about this | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| analogous to | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's where it gets tricky | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Beware the motivation. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yeah but | 01/01/70 00:00 |