??? 01/21/10 10:34 Modified: 01/21/10 10:36 Read: times |
#172635 - modulating the excitation Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Kai Klaas said:
Yes, of course. But again, the precision of these voltage dividers must be extremely high and the temp drift and long-term drift extremely low. Ap, why don't you modulate the excitation voltage of the bridge by a AC signal? Then, you wouldn't need to battle with this annoyingly high DC offset voltage. Kai Klaas Kai , I did that stuff in the past but in the end I had to resort to AD598 for RVDT conditioning :). I explore 0.1% 25ppm resistors to be ok(0.4$/part from KOA speer) do you recommend other resistors? I can source from Taiwan 5ppm parts.For our info The sensor accuracy is 0.25%FS with 0.025%FS/C as span coeff . stephan, Ti part you suggested fully fits the problem , will check this if discrete alternative fails . Thanks/ -Ap |
Topic | Author | Date |
Isolating xducer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not even a way | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
noise | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I wouldn't do that... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
agree | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
when within specified range!!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
why 8V or 20V | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
no specs violated | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
that is TOTALLY irrelevant | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Jumping to conclusions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
AC modulating the bridge excitation voltage? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
modulating the excitation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
make it simple at start | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
making it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
o, i see... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
from my experience with loadcells ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
what is exactly "xducer" ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Offsetting a signal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes but...? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Error analysis and budget | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Common Mode suppression | 01/01/70 00:00 |