| ??? 07/26/09 21:13 Read: times Msg Score: +1 +1 Good Question |
#167908 - The old story... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
The problem is not, that the code might saturate, but that we don't know what Chico is actually planning to do. He only tells us that a refresh rate of 8 x 200 = 1600 is not acceptable, but not how and why.
Chico, start to formulate understandable questions. Explain why something is a problem, what you intend to do, what goes wrong and where you actually need help. Many members here have given you code snippets and were finally wasting their time, only because you were unable to concretely specify your problem. Kai |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Simple PWM to drive led | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Loop lasts too long! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I put the delay... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Did you see? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| didnt noticed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ok, try the following... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the JMP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I thought this was your intention... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another try | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| is possible to filter the pwm output... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PWM from a Timer interrupt? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| questions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| best code until now | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| read replies | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| will lower refresh rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Time to switch... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wrong. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| my code is doing what I want | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| TIming | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FOR NOW!!!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The old story... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DJNZ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Dec | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Do nothing? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Speed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| slowdown | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Chico | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not yet... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
good catch | 01/01/70 00:00 |