??? 03/18/09 15:58 Read: times |
#163604 - Ok, try the following... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Chico said:
After your change in the code, it started to not work the way I want... altough, my code is ok.
Does exists a intelligent way to make my code faster or smaller? I'm breaking my head, but nothing comes out (until now). Well, everything I did was to remove the huge delay loop. Just try to remove the delay loop by yourself. The flickering comes from the enormous length of the whole routine. Decreasing or eliminating the delay would help to decrease the flickering. Kai |
Topic | Author | Date |
Simple PWM to drive led | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Loop lasts too long! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I put the delay... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Did you see? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
didnt noticed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ok, try the following... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the JMP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I thought this was your intention... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Another try | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
is possible to filter the pwm output... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
PWM from a Timer interrupt? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
questions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
best code until now | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
read replies | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
will lower refresh rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Time to switch... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Wrong. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
my code is doing what I want | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
TIming | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
FOR NOW!!!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The old story... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
DJNZ | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Dec | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Do nothing? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Speed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
slowdown | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Chico | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not yet... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
good catch | 01/01/70 00:00 |