Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
09/30/08 18:53
Read: times


 
#158693 - Wounded Chips
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Per Westermark said:
This was not bad ethics but actually quite clever - the alternative would have been to throw away all 64kbit chips that didn't pass the full tests.

My personal experience with "wounded" chips is that they are much more likely to fail than a totally good chip.

For example, consider a spec of dust on a chip which destroys the memory bit lying under it. It may also destroy half of the adjacent bit line. Using this chip in an application that avoids the bad bit could cause a later failure when the damaged bit line finally opens up.

Chip testing is an art. You can't check everything. So the best methodology is to throw away anything that might be bad in any way. Silicon is cheap. Returns aren't.




List of 15 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
needs un-pic-ing            01/01/70 00:00      
   Off-the-shelf? Well, maybe ...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Own PCB + switches            01/01/70 00:00      
         I reckon            01/01/70 00:00      
      New RPN calculator            01/01/70 00:00      
   Not first though            01/01/70 00:00      
      Casio            01/01/70 00:00      
      Caveats            01/01/70 00:00      
         Sinclair Black Watch            01/01/70 00:00      
            Sinclair            01/01/70 00:00      
               Alternative use of faulty components            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Wounded Chips            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Silicon has not always been cheap            01/01/70 00:00      
                  pre-spectrum            01/01/70 00:00      
         scientific DIY watch            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List