??? 08/12/08 17:35 Read: times |
#157441 - Since there's help available ... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
You could generate your own ...
Have you contacted Loren Blaney yet? I think it's trivial to do that through the 6502 Group website http://www.6502group.org/ . That site was set up long after I no longer was an "active" in the group. I'm not expert regarding XPL0, or 'C' for that matter, because I prefer to use ASM for small jobs under, say 500 k lines, and I attempt to get others to do the big ones. I doubt that it will be difficult getting source code for everything. The compiler, BTW, is written in XPL0. Since the evolution of the PC, the intermediate language interpreter has more or less fallen away, but it's a construct you might find useful. For the 6502, it was about 2 KB, and the compiler was about 8 KB in memory. Since you may, based on history, have some understanding of the significance of those figures, you can evaluate whether you'd want to do something similar. You don't necessarily have to use XPL0 as your source language, nor do you have to use the I2L architecture. However, as a concept, it's a sound and thoroughly proven one. You don't have to reverse-engineer anything, since commented source code is available. There's even a manual. RE |
Topic | Author | Date |
Virtual or existing architecture for emulation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Additional info about host/usage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How about MIPS? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
VHDL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
take a look at the content | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I think 8 or 16 bit is optimum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Maybe you should start with an ARM chip | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I2L sounds interesting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It's probably best to check with the maintainers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Doesn't seem to be a C to I2L | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Since there's help available ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
With the low price of 8-bit single chip MCUs... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Slave processors not an alternative | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Users | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Probably debugging on PC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Are you really going to do that! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Existing building blocks helps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It hasn't been done for you but ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
When I was in school ... | 01/01/70 00:00 |