??? 08/12/08 07:39 Read: times |
#157413 - Users Responding to: ???'s previous message |
How motivated will your users need to be to write a plugin if you don't provide a really good debugger.
If you want to provide users with a programming facility and speed is not the top priority, then you should provide them with an interpreted language, not a compiled one. I would suggest Forth, as you can easily run multiple virtual interpreters. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Virtual or existing architecture for emulation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Additional info about host/usage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How about MIPS? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
VHDL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
take a look at the content | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I think 8 or 16 bit is optimum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Maybe you should start with an ARM chip | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I2L sounds interesting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It's probably best to check with the maintainers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Doesn't seem to be a C to I2L | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Since there's help available ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
With the low price of 8-bit single chip MCUs... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Slave processors not an alternative | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Users | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Probably debugging on PC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Are you really going to do that! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Existing building blocks helps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It hasn't been done for you but ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
When I was in school ... | 01/01/70 00:00 |