??? 07/07/08 18:11 Read: times |
#156492 - excellent advice, however - and Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Turn off compiler optimization for embeded applications and save yourself a headache!
HOWEVER with Keil keep the optimizer level at 2 to get variable overlaying, which is essential for the '51. You will, unfortunetely, also get a few other "optimizations" which, fortunately, are minimal and insignificant. AND I pity those of you that work in a cost environment (we are going to make 10,000,000 of these) that force you to optimize. So. I modify Mahmoods statement to "Unless management force you not to, turn off compiler optimization and save yourself a headache". Note, I did not only insert the addition, but also removed "for embedded applications" Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Why Is Debugging Optimized Code Such an Issue? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Usually not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
False Assumptions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
"language specification" ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Do not assume it is that easy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Common Stuff Leading To Errors | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
"common stuff" falling apart when optimized | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
How broken things work | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It is not like that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A bad workman blames his tools | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A common side effect of optimisation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Newbies | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
another good reason | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
a rule of thumb | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
excellent advice, however - and | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Defeatist? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Or turn it down as needed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Using Pragmas During Debugging | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Free lunch? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
a dream | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
If it were easy everone would be doing it. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
you can't | 01/01/70 00:00 |