Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
05/28/08 04:43
Read: times


 
#155198 - It's just another way to get the job done.
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Erik Malund said:
kind of derives its own direction control. if you treat it carefully.

If you don't treat it carefully, you get what you deserve.

I thoroughly read the datasheet a while ago and the above is what I read.

If you do not (as with any other 485 implementation on a '51) have the proper waits between transmit from a and transmit from b it will, of course, fail.

As you might expect. I'm not sure I'm understanding what you mean by A and B. This is a single differential transceiver, hence A=/B and vice versa. Is the skew between those two what concerns you?

This chip is more critical in that respect than a 'regular' "direction pin transceiver" and and as you have to determine the 'when' anyhow, where is the advantage?

Primarily, it's in that you don't have to have an isolated enable.

It's just another device for the task, but it does regulate its own supply, and make that available for use by the optoisolators, which helps with cost and complexity.

Erik





List of 25 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
RS485 questions            01/01/70 00:00      
   Yes its required            01/01/70 00:00      
      +            01/01/70 00:00      
         you can not achieve isolation ....            01/01/70 00:00      
            +            01/01/70 00:00      
               why common power and isolated 485?            01/01/70 00:00      
         where to get supply            01/01/70 00:00      
            RS485 experiences            01/01/70 00:00      
               all the stuff inside            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Prifibus alike            01/01/70 00:00      
                     not with '176            01/01/70 00:00      
                        sn75lbc176 planed            01/01/70 00:00      
                           why galvanic isolation ?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              what is wrong?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 then try MAX3158            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    how about this little gem?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       have you read it fully            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          It's just another way to get the job done.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             OK, I'll bend it in neon            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Prifibus alike ..... it isn't            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Galavanic isolation            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Galavanic isolation            01/01/70 00:00      
   Do it like Profibus            01/01/70 00:00      
   economical approach            01/01/70 00:00      
      Thanks for all answers!            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List