| ??? 02/12/08 15:02 Read: times |
#150656 - not inherently Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
I have 47 different makes from the same source. Actually, don't you have 47 different .bat files? With make, you could parameterise a single makefile to build all your variants - though, of course, that may well end up more complicated than just having 47 different .bat files... This is the bitch with all that IDE crap It's not an inherent limitation of the IDE concept, but it certainly is a limitation of certain specific IDE implementations - Keil's uVision in particular :-( it ASS U MEs that you only make one thing from one source uVision plays lip-service to the idea that you might have multiple "targets", but any serious attempt to use it soon shows up its fundamental limitations :-( |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Let's have a rant about IDEs... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re Eclipse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You got further than me, then! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re looking at Eclipse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Eclipse | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What do you want integrated in your IDE? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| More than that! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| How about ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you want ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What I want from my IDE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| no, it is not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not inherently | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reply and an example | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Multiple targets with make | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| true, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| IDE's | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| true! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| make vs. batch | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| That's a key! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| .. and make one, two or all? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| make of it what you will | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Don't start from here! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what's the difference? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The right tool for the job | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| please e-mail me or post a copy | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Make with 3 targets | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| make????? | 01/01/70 00:00 |