| ??? 11/30/07 20:11 Modified: 11/30/07 21:07 Read: times |
#147669 - again and again we see Responding to: ???'s previous message |
So, don't make the mistake to use ... cheap ... and to believe you can make it
Again and again we see somebody who see something and say "I can make that for half the price" For instance, just how many single/double sided board 16/18/24bit A/D 'solutions' have been presented here? Bless those who succeed, but so far nobody has succeeded by just "doing it as the rest of the bunch, but on the cheap". For instance, there may be some breakthrough one day where a cheap replacement for a loadcell that does not need calibration get invented and whoever does that may very well succed, but just making the same in a cheaper lower grade will not do it unless you cheat on the specs and that, in most countries, will get you in real trouble. Erik to everybody doing cheap stuff with A/D resolution is NOT precision |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Self calibrating sensor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| calibrating without reference/standard? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ofcourse with reference signal present. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What do You mind? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| here is what I need | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| so go make... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| glue a cheap EEPROM to the loadcell | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| glue a cheap EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Max 1457 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| MAX1457 that makes .. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| EV kit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| EV kit for part Max1457 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Link --- this s/w works with XP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| FYI | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If they vary by 10%, ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| again and again we see | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If they vary by 10%, ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a miserable sensor, why the requirement | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I dont require precision... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Can anyone I dentify its manufacturer | 01/01/70 00:00 |