??? 11/28/07 10:50 Read: times |
#147494 - Not really ultrasonic. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Remembering that old remote controls did used to use ultrasonics,
Actually, they were using frequency that are still inside the human hearing range (for undamaged, young ears). I remember that I was able to "hear" the squeal of the remote of our TV when I was a little kid. My wife can still hear those "ultrasonic" "cat squealers" that supposedly keep your neighbors cats off your lawn. The advantage of this almost-but-not-quite ultrasound is that you can probably send/receive it with "audio-type" equipment, instead of having to deal with actual ultrasound equipment. I somehow doubt that ultrasound in the MHz range would be any good for data transmission in air - you'd probably lose most of the energy just trying to cross the solid->air transition in your transmitter. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Ultrasound Data Link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not really ultrasonic. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The other issue ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Echoes | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Speed of sound vs. speed of light | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
multipath | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Signal attenuation is very big | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Similarity to IR remote | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the cheapest ultrasound transceivers ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Frequency ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Fish finder freq. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Miniscule | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thanks - that's useful | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RC5 should do it | 01/01/70 00:00 |