Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
11/28/07 10:50
Read: times


 
#147494 - Not really ultrasonic.
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Remembering that old remote controls did used to use ultrasonics,

Actually, they were using frequency that are still inside the human hearing range (for undamaged, young ears). I remember that I was able to "hear" the squeal of the remote of our TV when I was a little kid.

My wife can still hear those "ultrasonic" "cat squealers" that supposedly keep your neighbors cats off your lawn.

The advantage of this almost-but-not-quite ultrasound is that you can probably send/receive it with "audio-type" equipment, instead of having to deal with actual ultrasound equipment. I somehow doubt that ultrasound in the MHz range would be any good for data transmission in air - you'd probably lose most of the energy just trying to cross the solid->air transition in your transmitter.

List of 14 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Ultrasound Data Link            01/01/70 00:00      
   Not really ultrasonic.            01/01/70 00:00      
   The other issue ...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Echoes            01/01/70 00:00      
         Speed of sound vs. speed of light            01/01/70 00:00      
         multipath            01/01/70 00:00      
   Signal attenuation is very big            01/01/70 00:00      
   Similarity to IR remote            01/01/70 00:00      
      the cheapest ultrasound transceivers ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         Frequency ?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Fish finder freq.            01/01/70 00:00      
         Miniscule            01/01/70 00:00      
      Thanks - that's useful            01/01/70 00:00      
         RC5 should do it            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List