| ??? 03/11/07 01:24 Read: times |
#134695 - Yes Responding to: ???'s previous message |
It's my understanding they did. The problem is actually quite a bit older than that, just not in the digital sense. I'm told Bell telephone had to deal with the Y1.9K problem. But I've never heard any specifics. Before too long, we're going to need 64 bit time_t and some other structure to go with it to correct for reletivistic shifts. :-) |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| weekend quiz - well, sort of... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The lease | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Planet Earth gets ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Its the time at which......... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Y2k38 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Which results are those? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sorry for my bad English... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not about your English. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| or yours | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| my father and some other stuff | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The point is that the y2k bug was a joke | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Y2K | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Prove a negative | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Global warming | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| this one time... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more info | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nothing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Mortgage calculations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes | 01/01/70 00:00 |