| ??? 03/07/07 02:43 Read: times |
#134432 - why rms Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Steve M. Taylor said:
Rustu Kaya said:
If it is satisfactorly, than buy an MX636 (true rms convertor) WHY ? Steve WHY not?...gives a better scaling at least. A simple RC is usually well enaugh though more susceptable to noises and to low PWM rates...Anyway, it is up to the project's need. Rustu |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| precision duty cycle to analog signal conversion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| WHY? and how | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 16 bits resolution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Uncertainty | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| uncertanity | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PWM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it's an AWFUL solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Or stick with the F352... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Is "F352" a 4-letter word... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well, if you want to look like me ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Really? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
What sensor? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Resolution does not help you here. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Analog signal is proportional | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you are right | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Simple answer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| true rms convertor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why RMS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why rms | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RMS detectors suffer from high crest factors,... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why, oh why | 01/01/70 00:00 |