| ??? 02/26/07 20:06 Read: times |
#133748 - Yes... Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Russ said:
In fact, one of the terms in the alternate solution is identical to your S1. Yes. But where I tried to generate no"1", one"1" and two"1" signals independantly and always needed one inverter for each of these signals, the guy in the link was able to mix some of these terms to throw out one inverter. That was just the point where I failed. Kai |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| weekend brainteaser | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| here goes my weekend. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Dont worry once you see the answer its obvious. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Logically thinking... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| you are quite close | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| One solution... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yey we have a winner | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Very Nice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| An Alternate Solution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ive run out ;-( | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Congratulations, Kai! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Now it is clearer... | 01/01/70 00:00 |