| ??? 04/27/06 15:29 Read: times |
#115120 - Reply to :comments Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik said:
but what if you end up using part of the circuit in a way that the original designer did not anticipate Analysing the circuit, i could come to a conclusion on the output at a point (fora particular i/p). for eg: refering to my circuit if the i/p of the DAC changes from high to low, this could lead to corresponding reduction of current at coil+,coil-. This current values could be calculated using the formulas. so if the designer had added a resistor in some place also, i could try to analyse the change it would impose to the signal. Erik said:
(You do not know what the intention was) and some "crummy little problem" turn up. Without any knowledge of the basis for the design, how are you going to modify it? I know(from the manual) about the intended purpose for which it is designed. So, iam getting the "specifications and test conditions related to measuring the Reed Switch parameters" that i would like to measure, and checking, how well it could be done with the circuit i have in my hand. But i agree its not that interesting than developing a fresh design. Suresh. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Circuit Analysis | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it might be easier to help if we knew | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Reply | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| last time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I second that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Erik, This is not the only work iam carr | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| comments | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It amazes me | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| old soldiers never die | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sorry, mine has an electron gun! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| son of a(n electronic) gun | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Exactly. Its what iam trying ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| HUH? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| LM412 source current for a particular .. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Zilch | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The basics..... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Reply to :comments | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Reverse engeering?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Let me give all the informations i have | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Well, I wasted my time then! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Faulty design? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks and few more.... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Please! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reply | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| When "inheriting" a complex design, you | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
and sometimes ... | 01/01/70 00:00 |