| ??? 10/27/05 20:32 Read: times |
#103058 - I needed that Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Thanks, Bruce
I were thinkng something simple, and seeing your post (and agreeing with it) I relize that a "quick fix" is not it. I suggest you use ac sensor excitation to minimize electrolysis of the sensor elements when a resistance sensor is planned Thatis (naah - should be) sensors 101. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| soil dampness | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Conductivity? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Conductivity | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| addendum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nutsy idea? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Configuration/calibration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that would not be calibration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| humidity | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Water for a short while and compare | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Spatially Distributed Soil Measurements | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I needed that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There is Yet Hope | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| soil dampness | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Gypsum block sensor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Capacitance. | 01/01/70 00:00 |