| ??? 10/26/05 21:01 Read: times |
#102994 - that would not be calibration Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Can you ever really get rid of the calibration/configuration here completely? It seems to be an oversimplification to assume that every application would have the same threshold for when to irrigate and when not to.
were I to make this commercially (feel free) no calibration would be needed but there would be a setting "how wet do you want it". By no calibration needed, there could be a marker at the setting pot "normal", that would not be possible if calibration was part of the game. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| soil dampness | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Conductivity? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Conductivity | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| addendum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nutsy idea? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Configuration/calibration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that would not be calibration | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| humidity | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Water for a short while and compare | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Spatially Distributed Soil Measurements | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I needed that | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There is Yet Hope | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| soil dampness | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Gypsum block sensor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Capacitance. | 01/01/70 00:00 |