| ??? 01/24/12 17:11 Read: times |
#185653 - why? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
a) We have the entire toolchain (compiler, JTAG debugger, etc) and it's paid for itself.
b) Years of experience using the device family. c) They do what we need them to do, without fuss. -a |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Why is the MCS-51 family your uC family of preference? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| My Choice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Just a question of preferences | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's the instruction set ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| new '51 derivatives appearing monthly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Instruction Set | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Forgot one! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The PIC is as Old as the 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AVR is hardly "new" in semiconductor terms... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It may be older ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| indeed it is.. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a questionaire from the past | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why is it my preference? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
why? | 01/01/70 00:00 |