| ??? 10/30/11 20:46 Read: times |
#184459 - Topic Author Date Responding to: ???'s previous message |
One reason, many 89s52 in my lab. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| SPI Slave in 89S52 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Get real processor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Topic Author Date | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Big problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Look for a different model | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Try 8051 BASCOM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| at what speed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Interpreters have an easier life. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Soft SPI speed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| But how to combine that loop with a real program? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| and more | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Software master trivial - slave is not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SPI analysis is made, results? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There _may_ be a solution - but maybe not acceptable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sure, and so what? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SPI at 100Kbps | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Still gives puny transfer rate with significant limitations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the answer is | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Fully Interlocked Handshaking. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Quite common | 01/01/70 00:00 |