| ??? 09/13/11 02:26 Read: times |
#183741 - function pointers in SDCC Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hello,
You may want to try add '__reentrant' to the function definition? byte Plus (byte a, byte b) __reentrant { return a+b;
}
From page 39, Note that the reentrant keyword just means that the parameters & local variables will be allocated to the stack, it does not mean that the function is register bank independent. I'm not sure it will help, but it certainly seems like the right ball park to play in.... Rich. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| SDCC: function pointers in an ISR | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Alternative | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: Alternative | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Register bank 1 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: register bank 1 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Using... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Lack of orthogonality | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| incorrect warning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: incorrect warning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not fixed yet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| re: not fixed yet | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Actel's answer. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| warning | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| function pointers in SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bug fixed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Actel support | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Still on the payroll | 01/01/70 00:00 |