| ??? 05/17/10 14:09 Read: times |
#175970 - *replacements* are not so bad Responding to: ???'s previous message |
David Prentice said:
You will have to connect / disconnect / heat / cool a sensor to identify it. But this is a one-off job at installation. Erik Malund said:
I may not have been totally clear/explicit, the problem I realized was that you can not "just send a spare" you need a skilled techie to replace damaged units. As David also said, making a replcement is not so bad, as the system should be able to identify the change - and adapt automatically. This assumes, of course, that you only replace one at a time. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| multi DS18B20 problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Please explain! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Need a concept | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: "I think" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| device ID vs sensor location | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Threat?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I had a thought once of a device ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| They have two eeprom locations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that, I realized, but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| *replacements* are not so bad | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 1-Wire: problem of relating physical location to device-ID | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
my problem solved | 01/01/70 00:00 |