Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
05/14/10 20:04
Read: times


 		 #175917 - well, you get what you pay for and
Responding to: ???'s previous message
As I said earlier this doc is dated 1998.
well, you get what you pay for and most programmers hate documenting, so expecting them to do it for free may be a bit much.

If your installation does not have this file, I will email it to you.
thanks, I have that piece of history

I would guess that you want an ASM file to link in with Compiled C code. So I always just compile file.c to file.s and edit the generated file.s
good idea, will try

I more and more get the impression that the SDCC 'collaborators' are C fanatics and consider asm an abnomiation. When (as shown in some things I saw earlier) your C is a bit slower executing than "the other brand" you should be even more intersted in supporting assembler which then will be even more interesting for the snippets needing real speed.

Erik


List of 23 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
SDCC assembler Questions            01/01/70 00:00      
   :: or .globl            01/01/70 00:00      
   do you mean .globl directive?l            01/01/70 00:00      
   so far, so good now how specify xdata            01/01/70 00:00      
      what are you trying to do            01/01/70 00:00      
   is there a current SDCC documentation?            01/01/70 00:00      
      at least UserGuide from Googel :-)            01/01/70 00:00      
         unsigned char _far _at(0x700) buf[0x100]            01/01/70 00:00      
         without a word about the assembler            01/01/70 00:00      
      documentation            01/01/70 00:00      
         sample in pseudocode            01/01/70 00:00      
            okay and how do you want to use it?            01/01/70 00:00      
               a simple example            01/01/70 00:00      
                  thanks for the examples and ...            01/01/70 00:00      
      current SDCC documentation            01/01/70 00:00      
         evidently XDATA assembler is not 'current'            01/01/70 00:00      
            my installation has asxxhtm.html in doc/as            01/01/70 00:00      
               well, you get what you pay for and            01/01/70 00:00      
                  SDCC is free after all            01/01/70 00:00      
                     They frequently claim it in the negative            01/01/70 00:00      
                     from my first post "            01/01/70 00:00      
                        asxxxx tools            01/01/70 00:00      
                           as it turned out ...            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List