??? 03/24/10 17:47 Read: times |
#174479 - I did not know Keil helper functions. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I have an old evaluation Keil compiler.
Can you now say? eeprom long variable = 0x12345678; ... variable = 0x5678ABC; if you just provide helper 'internal' access functions. I must admit to preferring a specific function or macro. It means that you can always port your code. Obviously your macro for Keil would just reduce to the simple syntax. David. |
Topic | Author | Date |
Atmel 89C5131A-UM Internal memory programming | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
compiler specific | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Reply | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sample code? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Timers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Timers Reply | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Have you looked at the tutorials yet? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
it's all for assembler - but that doesn't matter! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Huge amounts of data | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
disregard the large numbers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No compiler support for EEPROM | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
compiler handling the EEPROM transparently | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I did not know Keil helper functions. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It's part of the "xdata banking" support | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Previously, on 8052.com...![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |