Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
01/20/10 08:50
Modified:
  01/20/10 08:51
Read: times


 		 #172610 - Keil: Specifics and non-specifics
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Yash Chitalia said:
This code is not getting compiled in Keil. The error shown is 'missing ";" before "_at" ', which is probably due to the difference in the syntax of Keil and SDCC.

Yes - this has already been explained:
http://www.8052.com/forum/read/172589
http://www.8052.com/forum/read/172582

This is why it's so important for both you to clearly state what compiler you use, and people supplying "sample" code to state what compiler(s) it's intended for!

For specific Keil details, you obviously need to study the Keil manuals: http://www.keil.com/support/man_c51.htm

Keil's proprietary language extensions in C51 are all listed here: http://www.keil.com/support/m...nsions.htm


1) I searched for the right syntax for initializing the lookup in Keil but couldn't find it.

That's because there isn't any - Keil (and SDCC) is perfectly standard in this respect!


List of 41 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Controlling multiple servo motors            01/01/70 00:00      
   executing code takes time            01/01/70 00:00      
      PWM code            01/01/70 00:00      
         Thanks...now, about the PCA timer..            01/01/70 00:00      
   If SDCC Then Keil            01/01/70 00:00      
      PWM IRQ code in C, bitops, 45 byte            01/01/70 00:00      
         Optimization having no effect.            01/01/70 00:00      
      PWM IRQ code in C, lookup table, 32 byte            01/01/70 00:00      
         I haven't understood the table lookup concept very well...            01/01/70 00:00      
            table lookup            01/01/70 00:00      
         PWM IRQ code in C, lookup table, 30 byte            01/01/70 00:00      
            Compiler specifics            01/01/70 00:00      
               absolutely-locating xdata at 256 byte boundary            01/01/70 00:00      
                  I see.            01/01/70 00:00      
            An example code..            01/01/70 00:00      
               Keil: Specifics and non-specifics            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Not really working...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     Enough power?            01/01/70 00:00      
                        RE: running 32 servo motors            01/01/70 00:00      
      The chip sounds perfect...            01/01/70 00:00      
         not worth it            01/01/70 00:00      
            Servo control will become difficult then...            01/01/70 00:00      
               output            01/01/70 00:00      
               HCT chips have ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Eval a concept with a single PCA and 3:8 HCT multiplexer?            01/01/70 00:00      
               Check their website            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Here is the code...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     "sbit MTRS=P2^0;" is not OK here            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Keil syntax?            01/01/70 00:00      
                           "#define" not working.."sbit" works            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Yes, you were correct originally!            01/01/70 00:00      
            Seconded            01/01/70 00:00      
   Servo_0.1.zip            01/01/70 00:00      
      links            01/01/70 00:00      
   Eventually feed the guys at http://servomaster.sf.net ?            01/01/70 00:00      
      servomaster.sf.net FLOSS            01/01/70 00:00      
   Maybe of some use...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Whoops... found a bug            01/01/70 00:00      
         What bug?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Bug            01/01/70 00:00      
   Improved version uploaded            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List